Students standing for traditional values, the faith of our fathers, and our constitutional republic.
Showing posts with label diversity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diversity. Show all posts
Sunday, January 27, 2008
STUDENT CULTURE WARRIORS
Paleo Radio can be heard every Monday and Friday night from 7-10pm EST by going to www.wocrfm.com. The site is only compatible with Internet Explorer.
Monday, January 21, 2008
Thursday, January 17, 2008
LEFTISTS' ATTACK ON AMERICANISM

American students are feeling more and more guilt with every passing day. This is especially true among white, Christian, heterosexual, conservative males. Whether we are made to feel guilty for slavery, gender inequalities, unfair money distribution, homophobia, religious pride, or the fact that we were born with a male sex organ, the left in America is working long and hard to make us feel as if we have done something wrong. Worse yet, they insist that we are the problem!
So the Diversophiles and Multiculturecrats have set in place an endless number of "programs" to help us in realizing just how bad we really are. Sure, we don't realize it yet, but after a few sensitivity training sessions in group think and guilt manipulation we should be mentally and emotionally vulnerable for anything they throw our way
Here is the rap sheet: Slavery? Yep, our fault. White Americans were the only people to have ever owned slaves in human history. Gender inequalities? Certainly that is the result of wicked white men conspiring with one another! Homophobia? Of course. I mean, it has nothing to do with the fact that we sincerely believe that homosexuality is unnatural, immoral, and dangerous to society! Religious pride? Ah, at last we realize that all religions are equal and that there is no hierarchy among their espoused morals or truth claims. Being born men? Well, this may be tough to fix, but as long as we are in touch with our feminine side and realize that egalitarian equality is the way of the day, then all is well.
Granted, I am being sarcastic here. Still, this is not as uncommon as we may think. This is especially true within academia. The goal is no longer liberal arts; no, the goal is leftist indoctrination. They don't want to give students the skills to better themselves; no, they want to mandate attendance to seminars that reprogram the way students think about themselves, their families, their heritage, their race, their economic status, their sexuality, their religion, and the world they live in. We are talking about a comprehensive overhaul of a student's world and life view. For the leftists, nothing short of this will suffice.
It is for this reason that students must stand up and fight for what they believe to be true, what they know to be true. Why be ashamed of your forefathers? Why be ashamed of your heritage and traditions? Why be afraid to speak publicly about your religion, without fear of retribution? Why be coaxed into believing that homosexuality is natural, moral, and safe? Why? Because guilt manipulation is a powerful weapon, and the left knows it.
Unless white, Christian, heterosexual, conservative males begin standing up for what they believe in their heart of hearts to be true, I don't see their being any change of the ideological tide any time soon. In fact, I think that we'd be left with nothing more than a dirge and a funeral procession for an American once so beautiful...
So the Diversophiles and Multiculturecrats have set in place an endless number of "programs" to help us in realizing just how bad we really are. Sure, we don't realize it yet, but after a few sensitivity training sessions in group think and guilt manipulation we should be mentally and emotionally vulnerable for anything they throw our way
Here is the rap sheet: Slavery? Yep, our fault. White Americans were the only people to have ever owned slaves in human history. Gender inequalities? Certainly that is the result of wicked white men conspiring with one another! Homophobia? Of course. I mean, it has nothing to do with the fact that we sincerely believe that homosexuality is unnatural, immoral, and dangerous to society! Religious pride? Ah, at last we realize that all religions are equal and that there is no hierarchy among their espoused morals or truth claims. Being born men? Well, this may be tough to fix, but as long as we are in touch with our feminine side and realize that egalitarian equality is the way of the day, then all is well.
Granted, I am being sarcastic here. Still, this is not as uncommon as we may think. This is especially true within academia. The goal is no longer liberal arts; no, the goal is leftist indoctrination. They don't want to give students the skills to better themselves; no, they want to mandate attendance to seminars that reprogram the way students think about themselves, their families, their heritage, their race, their economic status, their sexuality, their religion, and the world they live in. We are talking about a comprehensive overhaul of a student's world and life view. For the leftists, nothing short of this will suffice.
It is for this reason that students must stand up and fight for what they believe to be true, what they know to be true. Why be ashamed of your forefathers? Why be ashamed of your heritage and traditions? Why be afraid to speak publicly about your religion, without fear of retribution? Why be coaxed into believing that homosexuality is natural, moral, and safe? Why? Because guilt manipulation is a powerful weapon, and the left knows it.
Unless white, Christian, heterosexual, conservative males begin standing up for what they believe in their heart of hearts to be true, I don't see their being any change of the ideological tide any time soon. In fact, I think that we'd be left with nothing more than a dirge and a funeral procession for an American once so beautiful...
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
FOR THE COMMONWEALTH

Aquinas: The Treatise on Law Qu. 90. The Essence of Law
2. Is the law always directed towards the Common Good? A: Every part is ordered to the whole as the imperfect to the perfect. The individual is part of a perfect whole that is the community. Therefore, law must concern itself in particular with the happiness of the community.
Many may decry Aquinas of proposing Communism. This would be a rather unfortunate rendering of what he had to say. He was far more concerned with law than economics, and he saw community in the form of a commonwealth rather than a communitarian utopia. He was, after all, quite aware of the flaws of man and the reality of inequality.
While many may wish to toss Aquinas to the wind, I think America would do well to consider his insight. There was a time when America understood the idea of a commonwealth. There was a time when America understood the idea of a nation. To be quite frank, there was once a time when America knew what America was! All of this has fallen to the wayside. Americanism - not the heresy - has become as elusive as a three-legged ballerina. To say that this is a tragedy would be a gross understatement.
America must regain its sense of identity. This requires common heritage, common traditions, a common religion, and common values. It takes Americans realizing, and accepting, that while the promises of "you can do anything you want" are nothing more than empty platitudes, they can most certainly do what they do best. And only they know what this is and how this is to be done.
But it is here where the individual and the common meet. It is here where we find a tension between what is good for the one and good for the many. This has been the trial of our times. Thankfully, we are not left to wander on our own. Those who came before us faced the same questions, and dealt with them in ways that we shouldn't take for granted.
These saints and sinners balanced out these two extremes with an archaic form of fusionism. On the one hand, they insisted on private property. On the other hand, they wished for the owner to feel a familial commitment to those around him. Likewise, they saw in man the right to elect a statesman. Still, they held them accountable to the wellbeing of the commonwealth. They also saw man's desire to pursue happiness as a great goal to be achieved. But they never mistook liberty for license. It was a balancing act, but one they did fairly well.
The cult of radical diversity, led by the Diversicrat ayatollahs, is tearing this country apart at the seams. Laissez faire tolerance of moral deviancy is eating away at our culture. It is long overdue for the people to rise up, to stand for God and country, and fight back the tide of degeneracy dominating this once great nation. Until we can balance our cultural institutions upon the tightrope of the one and the many, we will continue down this road. Unfortunately, this road is one that has been traveled by all great empires that once were but are no more.
2. Is the law always directed towards the Common Good? A: Every part is ordered to the whole as the imperfect to the perfect. The individual is part of a perfect whole that is the community. Therefore, law must concern itself in particular with the happiness of the community.
Many may decry Aquinas of proposing Communism. This would be a rather unfortunate rendering of what he had to say. He was far more concerned with law than economics, and he saw community in the form of a commonwealth rather than a communitarian utopia. He was, after all, quite aware of the flaws of man and the reality of inequality.
While many may wish to toss Aquinas to the wind, I think America would do well to consider his insight. There was a time when America understood the idea of a commonwealth. There was a time when America understood the idea of a nation. To be quite frank, there was once a time when America knew what America was! All of this has fallen to the wayside. Americanism - not the heresy - has become as elusive as a three-legged ballerina. To say that this is a tragedy would be a gross understatement.
America must regain its sense of identity. This requires common heritage, common traditions, a common religion, and common values. It takes Americans realizing, and accepting, that while the promises of "you can do anything you want" are nothing more than empty platitudes, they can most certainly do what they do best. And only they know what this is and how this is to be done.
But it is here where the individual and the common meet. It is here where we find a tension between what is good for the one and good for the many. This has been the trial of our times. Thankfully, we are not left to wander on our own. Those who came before us faced the same questions, and dealt with them in ways that we shouldn't take for granted.
These saints and sinners balanced out these two extremes with an archaic form of fusionism. On the one hand, they insisted on private property. On the other hand, they wished for the owner to feel a familial commitment to those around him. Likewise, they saw in man the right to elect a statesman. Still, they held them accountable to the wellbeing of the commonwealth. They also saw man's desire to pursue happiness as a great goal to be achieved. But they never mistook liberty for license. It was a balancing act, but one they did fairly well.
The cult of radical diversity, led by the Diversicrat ayatollahs, is tearing this country apart at the seams. Laissez faire tolerance of moral deviancy is eating away at our culture. It is long overdue for the people to rise up, to stand for God and country, and fight back the tide of degeneracy dominating this once great nation. Until we can balance our cultural institutions upon the tightrope of the one and the many, we will continue down this road. Unfortunately, this road is one that has been traveled by all great empires that once were but are no more.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Sunday, October 28, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

Profile

- Paleocrat
- Dorr, Michigan, United States
- Owner of PaleoRadio LLC, previously heard on WOLY, WOCR, and WPRR. He has served as chief aide to N.J. League of American Families president John Tomicki, was the president of Olivet Young Americans for Freedom, recognized/honored by Leadership Institute as one of the top-conservative student activists in the country; Currently on hiatus to write a book about his daughter’s life & death with childhood cancer.
FRIENDS
- Acton Institute
- American Conservative
- Anti-War.com
- Atheism Sucks
- Chronicles Magazine
- Honor Bound
- Leadership Institute
- LewRockwell.com
- MSU YAF
- National Conservatives
- National YAF
- Olivet College (MI)
- Olivet's Paleo Radio YouTube
- Paleoconservatist
- Southern Avenger
- The American Conservative
- UM-YAF Blog
- VDare
- YAF Michigan